Analysis in the critique of pure reason

Kantian Review 12 (1):61-89 (2007)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The paper argues that existing interpretations of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason as an "analysis of experience" (e.g., those of Kitcher and Strawson) fail because they do not properly appreciate the method of the work. The author argues that the Critique provides an analysis of the faculty of reason, and counts as an analysis of experience only in a derivative sense.
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MERAIT
Upload history
Archival date: 2012-10-10
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
401 ( #13,326 of 57,103 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
23 ( #31,398 of 57,103 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.