Risk, Harm and Intervention: the case of child obesity

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 17 (2):191-200 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In this paper we aim to demonstrate the enormous ethical complexity that is prevalent in child obesity cases. This complexity, we argue, favors a cautious approach. Against those perhaps inclined to blame neglectful parents, we argue that laying the blame for child obesity at the feet of parents is simplistic once the broader context is taken into account. We also show that parents not only enjoy important relational prerogatives worth defending, but that children, too, are beneficiaries of that relationship in ways difficult to match elsewhere. Finally, against the backdrop of growing public concern and pressure to intervene earlier in the life cycle, we examine the perhaps unintended stigmatizing effects that labeling and intervention can have and consider a number of risks and potential harms occasioned by state interventions in these cases.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-10-13
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Parents' Rights and the Value of the Family.Brighouse, Harry & Swift, Adam

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
45 ( #38,994 of 45,289 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
38 ( #20,880 of 45,289 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.