Memory without content? Radical enactivism and (post)causal theories of memory

Synthese 198 (Suppl 1):307-335 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Radical enactivism, an increasingly influential approach to cognition in general, has recently been applied to memory in particular, with Hutto and Peeters New directions in the philosophy of memory, Routledge, New York, 2018) providing the first systematic discussion of the implications of the approach for mainstream philosophical theories of memory. Hutto and Peeters argue that radical enactivism, which entails a conception of memory traces as contentless, is fundamentally at odds with current causal and postcausal theories, which remain committed to a conception of traces as contentful: on their view, if radical enactivism is right, then the relevant theories are wrong. Partisans of the theories in question might respond to Hutto and Peeters’ argument in two ways. First, they might challenge radical enactivism itself. Second, they might challenge the conditional claim that, if radical enactivism is right, then their theories are wrong. In this paper, we develop the latter response, arguing that, appearances to the contrary notwithstanding, radical enactivism in fact aligns neatly with an emerging tendency in the philosophy of memory: radical enactivists and causal and postcausal theorists of memory have begun to converge, for distinct but compatible reasons, on a contentless conception of memory traces.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MICMWC-2
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-01-31
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-01-31

Total views
467 ( #12,281 of 2,433,133 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
60 ( #11,892 of 2,433,133 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.