Why think that the brain is not a computer?

APA Newsletter on Philosophy and Computers 16 (2):22-28 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In this paper, I review the objections against the claim that brains are computers, or, to be precise, information-processing mechanisms. By showing that practically all the popular objections are either based on uncharitable interpretation of the claim, or simply wrong, I argue that the claim is likely to be true, relevant to contemporary cognitive (neuro)science, and non-trivial.

Author's Profile

Marcin Miłkowski
Polish Academy of Sciences


Added to PP

1,931 (#4,438)

6 months
119 (#28,408)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?