Are All Primitives Created Equal?

Southern Journal of Philosophy 56 (2):273-292 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Primitives are both important and unavoidable, and which set of primitives we endorse will greatly shape our theories and how those theories provide solutions to the problems that we take to be important. After introducing the notion of a primitive posit, I discuss the different kinds of primitives that we might posit. Following Cowling (2013), I distinguish between ontological and ideological primitives, and, following Benovsky (2013) between functional and content views of primitives. I then propose that these two distinctions cut across each other leading to four types of primitive posits. I then argue that theoretical virtues should be taken to be meta-theoretical ideological primitives. I close with some reflections on the global nature of comparing sets of primitives.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MILAAP-4
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-05-19
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 67 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-05-19

Total views
257 ( #15,770 of 46,444 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
85 ( #7,705 of 46,444 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.