Sharing the benefits of research fairly: two approaches

Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (4):219-223 (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Research projects sponsored by rich countries or companies and carried out in developing countries are often described as exploitative. One important debate about the prevention of exploitation in research centres on whether and how clinical research in developing countries should be responsive to local health problems. This paper analyses the responsiveness debate and draws out more general lessons for how policy makers can prevent exploitation in various research contexts. There are two independent ways to do this in the face of entrenched power differences: to impose restrictions on the content of benefit-sharing arrangements, and to institute independent effective oversight. Which method should be chosen is highly dependent on context
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MILSTB
Upload history
Archival date: 2016-08-25
View other versions
Added to PP index
2011-09-25

Total views
60 ( #40,831 of 51,672 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #38,589 of 51,672 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.