Methodology and Philosophy of Economics: A Tale of Two Biases

History of Economic Thought 64 (1):33-57 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article comprises an up-to-date critical review of the field known as Economic Methodology or Philosophy of Economics (EM/PE). Two edited volumes (Kincaid and Ross 2021; Heilmann and Reiss 2021), a special issue of the Journal of Economic Methodology (2021), and a recent bibliometric analysis of the field (Claveau et al. 2021) constitute the basis of the review. Drawing on these sources, we identify a number of problematic trends in current EM/PE research. We claim that these trends could be interpreted as two kinds of biases, namely a micro-level bias and a mainstream bias. We discuss the respective details of these biases and their normative implications for the discipline.

Author Profiles

Luis Mireles-Flores
University of Helsinki
Michiru Nagatsu
University of Helsinki

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-10-04

Downloads
824 (#22,877)

6 months
180 (#16,595)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?