Autonomous killer robots are probably good news

In Ezio Di Nucci & Filippo Santonio de Sio (eds.), Drones and responsibility: Legal, philosophical and socio-technical perspectives on the use of remotely controlled weapons. Ashgate. pp. 67-81 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Will future lethal autonomous weapon systems (LAWS), or ‘killer robots’, be a threat to humanity? The European Parliament has called for a moratorium or ban of LAWS; the ‘Contracting Parties to the Geneva Convention at the United Nations’ are presently discussing such a ban, which is supported by the great majority of writers and campaigners on the issue. However, the main arguments in favour of a ban are unsound. LAWS do not support extrajudicial killings, they do not take responsibility away from humans; in fact they increase the abil-ity to hold humans accountable for war crimes. Using LAWS in war would probably reduce human suffering overall. Finally, the availability of LAWS would probably not increase the probability of war or other lethal conflict—especially as compared to extant remote-controlled weapons. The widespread fear of killer robots is unfounded: They are probably good news.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MLLAKR
Revision history
First archival date: 2015-11-07
Latest version: 2 (2015-12-09)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Rethinking Responsibility in Science and Technology.Battaglia, Fiorella; Mukerji, Nikil & Nida-Rümelin, Julian (eds.)

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Should We Campaign Against Sex Robots?Danaher, John; Earp, Brian D. & Sandberg, Anders
Just War and Robots’ Killings.Simpson, Thomas W. & Müller, Vincent C.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-11-07

Total views
1,494 ( #1,121 of 42,199 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
195 ( #1,959 of 42,199 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.