Aristotle on Vice

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In this paper, I argue that the widely held view that Aristotle's vicious agent is a principled follower of a wrong conception of the good whose soul, just like the soul of the virtuous agent, is marked by harmony between his reason and non-rational desires is an exegetical mistake. Rather, Aristotle holds – consistently and throughout the Nicomachean Ethics – that the vicious agent lacks any real principles of action and that his soul lacks unity and harmony even more than the soul of the uncontrolled agent
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-10-20
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
.Annas, J. (ed.)

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Vice in the Nicomachean Ethics.Nielsen, Karen Margrethe

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
106 ( #25,325 of 42,388 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
26 ( #23,345 of 42,388 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.