Independence and new ways to remain steadfast in the face of disagreement

Episteme 15 (1):65-79 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
An important principle in the epistemology of disagreement is Independence, which states, “In evaluating the epistemic credentials of another’s expressed belief about P, in order to determine how (or whether) to modify my own belief about P, I should do so in a way that doesn’t rely on the reasoning behind my initial belief about P” (Christensen 2011, 1-2). I present a series of new counterexamples to both Independence and also a revised, more widely applicable, version of it. I then formulate and endorse a third version of Independence that avoids those counterexamples. Lastly, I show how this third version of Independence reveals two new ways one may remain steadfast in the face of two real life disagreements: one about God’s existence and one about moral realism.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2016-10-06
Latest version: 5 (2016-10-06)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
400 ( #11,641 of 52,879 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
40 ( #15,797 of 52,879 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.