Three Forms of Internalism and the New Evil Demon Problem

Episteme 9 (4):345-360 (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The new evil demon problem is often considered to be a serious obstacle for externalist theories of epistemic justification. In this paper, I aim to show that the new evil demon problem also afflicts the two most prominent forms of internalism: moderate internalism and historical internalism. Since virtually all internalists accept at least one of these two forms, it follows that virtually all internalists face the NEDP. My secondary thesis is that many epistemologists – including both internalists and externalists – face a dilemma. The only form of internalism that is immune to the NEDP, strong internalism, is a very radical and revisionary view – a large number of epistemologists would have to significantly revise their views about justification in order to accept it. Hence, either epistemologists must accept a theory that is susceptible to the NEDP or accept a very radical and revisionary view.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MOOTFO-7
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Knowledge and its Limits.Williamson, Timothy
Evidentialism.Feldman, Richard & Conee, Earl

View all 37 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-03-09

Total views
518 ( #7,762 of 50,121 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
38 ( #16,380 of 50,121 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.