Carnap's metrical conventionalism versus differential topology

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Geometry was a main source of inspiration for Carnap’s conventionalism. Taking Poincaré as his witness Carnap asserted in his dissertation Der Raum (Carnap 1922) that the metrical structure of space is conventional while the underlying topological structure describes "objective" facts. With only minor modifications he stuck to this account throughout his life. The aim of this paper is to disprove Carnap's contention by invoking some classical theorems of differential topology. By this means his metrical conventionalism turns out to be indefensible for mathematical reasons. This implies that the relation between to-pology and geometry cannot be conceptualized as analogous to the relation between the meaning of a proposition and its expression in some language as logical empiricists used to say.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Reprint years
2005
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MORCMC
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
390 ( #17,806 of 65,694 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #46,328 of 65,694 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.