From what to how: an initial review of publicly available AI ethics tools, methods and research to translate principles into practices

Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (4):2141-2168 (2020)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The debate about the ethical implications of Artificial Intelligence dates from the 1960s :741–742, 1960; Wiener in Cybernetics: or control and communication in the animal and the machine, MIT Press, New York, 1961). However, in recent years symbolic AI has been complemented and sometimes replaced by Neural Networks and Machine Learning techniques. This has vastly increased its potential utility and impact on society, with the consequence that the ethical debate has gone mainstream. Such a debate has primarily focused on principles—the ‘what’ of AI ethics —rather than on practices, the ‘how.’ Awareness of the potential issues is increasing at a fast rate, but the AI community’s ability to take action to mitigate the associated risks is still at its infancy. Our intention in presenting this research is to contribute to closing the gap between principles and practices by constructing a typology that may help practically-minded developers apply ethics at each stage of the Machine Learning development pipeline, and to signal to researchers where further work is needed. The focus is exclusively on Machine Learning, but it is hoped that the results of this research may be easily applicable to other branches of AI. The article outlines the research method for creating this typology, the initial findings, and provides a summary of future research needs.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MORFWT-5
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-06-08
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-12-12

Total views
49 ( #54,714 of 62,460 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #37,952 of 62,460 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.