Grading in Groups

Economics and Philosophy 32 (2):323-352 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Juries, committees and experts panels commonly appraise things of one kind or another on the basis of grades awarded by several people. When everybody's grading thresholds are known to be the same, the results sometimes can be counted on to reflect the graders’ opinion. Otherwise, they often cannot. Under certain conditions, Arrow's ‘impossibility’ theorem entails that judgements reached by aggregating grades do not reliably track any collective sense of better and worse at all. These claims are made by adapting the Arrow–Sen framework for social choice to study grading in groups.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MORGIG
Upload history
Archival date: 2016-06-08
View other versions
Added to PP index
2016-06-08

Total views
226 ( #22,808 of 55,806 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
23 ( #31,686 of 55,806 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.