Naïve Realism, Hallucination, and Causation: A New Response to the Screening Off Problem

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 97 (2):368-382 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper sets out a novel response to the ‘screening off problem’ for naïve realism. The aim is to resist the claim (which many naïve realists accept) that the kind of experience involved in hallucinating also occurs during perception, by arguing that there are causal constraints that must be met if an hallucinatory experience is to occur that are never met in perceptual cases. Notably, given this response, it turns out that, contra current orthodoxy, naïve realists need not adopt any particular view about the psychological nature of hallucinatory experience to handle the screening off problem. Consequently, room opens up for naïve realists to endorse whatever theory of hallucinatory experience seems to best capture the distinctive nature of such episodes.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Reprint years
2019
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MORNRH
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-07-16
View other versions
Added to PP index
2018-04-19

Total views
176 ( #25,185 of 52,780 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
33 ( #19,518 of 52,780 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.