Fake Journals: Not Always Valid Ways to Distinguish Them

Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (5):1391-1392 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In their recent paper, Esfe et al. present some criteria for fake journals and propose some ‘features’ to recognize them. While I share most of the authors’ concerns about this issue in general, some of the reported criteria are not fit to differentiate fake journals from genuine ones. Here are some examples derived from their list, which illustrate that such criteria are not necessarily specific to fake journals only, but they could also apply to well-established journals and, therefore, should not be considered as is
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
163 ( #34,628 of 2,448,738 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #55,544 of 2,448,738 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.