A conceptual analysis of fake news

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this paper, I offer a conceptual analysis of fake news. In essence, I suggest analysing this notion as a species of Frankfurtian bullshit. This construal, I argue, allows us to distinguish it from similar phenomena like bad or biased journalism and satire. First, I introduce four test cases. The first three are, intuitively, not cases of fake news, while the fourth one is. A correct conceptual analysis should, hence, exclude the first three while including the fourth. Next, I go through some factors that could explain the difference between the first three cases and the fourth one before I offer my explanation. After that, I propose an analysis of fake news and show that it matches our intuitions about the four test cases. Finally, I consider a possible objection to my proposal.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MUKACA
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-01-04
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
On Bullshit.Frankfurt, Harry
Liar!Webber, Jonathan

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-01-04

Total views
422 ( #7,016 of 41,572 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
111 ( #4,019 of 41,572 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.