A conceptual analysis of fake news

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this paper, I offer a conceptual analysis of fake news. In essence, I suggest analysing this notion as a species of Frankfurtian bullshit. This construal, I argue, allows us to distinguish it from similar phenomena like bad or biased journalism and satire. First, I introduce four test cases. The first three are, intuitively, not cases of fake news, while the fourth one is. A correct conceptual analysis should, hence, exclude the first three while including the fourth. Next, I go through some factors that could explain the difference between the first three cases and the fourth one before I offer my explanation. After that, I propose an analysis of fake news and show that it matches our intuitions about the four test cases. Finally, I consider a possible objection to my proposal.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MUKACA
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-01-04
View other versions
Added to PP index
2018-01-04

Total views
831 ( #6,442 of 64,221 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
90 ( #6,966 of 64,221 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.