What's Wrong with Libertarianism: A Meritocratic Diagnosis

In Jason Brennan, David Schmidtz & Bas van der Vossen (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Libertarianism. New York: Routledge. pp. 77-91 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Some people may think that libertarianism and meritocracy have much in common; that the libertarian's ideal world looks like the meritocrat's ideal world; and that the public policies guiding us to each are one and the same. This is wrong in all respects. In this essay I explain why. After providing an overview of meritocratic justice, I argue that meritocracy is a more compelling theory of distributive justice than libertarianism. Meritocracy better protects the core value of personal responsibility; incorporates efficiency-enhancing regulation which libertarianism cannot; provides more positive liberty; and solves salient, real-world debates about distributive justice.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2017-02-10
Latest version: 4 (2017-09-03)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
603 ( #9,687 of 2,449,140 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
69 ( #8,956 of 2,449,140 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.