What's in a Name? Qualitativism and Parsimony

Philosophical Studies 182 (5):1361-1381 (2025)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

According to qualitativism, thisness is not a fundamental feature of reality; facts about particular things are metaphysically second-rate. In this paper, I advance an argument for qualitativism from ideological parsimony. Supposing that reality fundamentally contains an array of propertied things, non-qualitativists employ a distinct name (or constant) for each fundamental thing. I argue that these names encode a type of worldly structure (thisness structure) that offends against parsimony and that qualitativists can eliminate without incurring a comparable parsimony-offense.

Author's Profile

Daniel S. Murphy
Le Moyne College

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-03-15

Downloads
109 (#103,148)

6 months
109 (#73,558)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?