The philosophical implications of the Perky experiments: reply to Hopkins

Analysis 72 (3):439-443 (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The Perky experiments are taken to demonstrate the phenomenal similarity between perception and visualization. Robert Hopkins argues that this interpretation should be resisted because it ignores an important feature of the experiments, namely, that they involve picture perception, rather than ordinary seeing. My aim is to point out that the force of this argument depends on one’s views on picture perception. On what I take to be the most mainstream account of picture perception, Hopkins’s argument does not work. But even if we accept Hopkins’s own account, we have good reasons to believe that his conclusion does not follow
PhilPapers/Archive ID
NANTPI-2
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-01-19
View other versions
Added to PP index
2012-03-13

Total views
172 ( #24,528 of 51,189 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #32,861 of 51,189 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.