Metaphysical Interdependence

In Mark Jago (ed.), Reality Making. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 38-56 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
It is commonly assumed that grounding relations are asymmetric. Here I develop and argue for a theory of metaphysical structure that takes grounding to be nonsymmetric rather than asymmetric. Even without infinite descending chains of dependence, it might be that every entity is grounded in some other entity. Having first addressed an immediate objection to the position under discussion, I introduce two examples of symmetric grounding. I give three arguments for the view that grounding is nonsymmetric (I call this view ‘metaphysical interdependence’). These arguments are: (i) that metaphysical interdependence is the only theory able to reconcile competing intuitions about grounding; (ii) that it is the only theory consistent with both ‘gunk’ and ‘junk’; and (iii) that offers a satisfactory solution to the problem concerning whether or not grounding is itself grounded.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2016-12-23
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
969 ( #5,897 of 69,201 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
137 ( #4,590 of 69,201 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.