Mapping the mind: bridge laws and the psycho-neural interface

Synthese 193 (2):637-657 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Recent advancements in the brain sciences have enabled researchers to determine, with increasing accuracy, patterns and locations of neural activation associated with various psychological functions. These techniques have revived a longstanding debate regarding the relation between the mind and the brain: while many authors claim that neuroscientific data can be employed to advance theories of higher cognition, others defend the so-called ‘autonomy’ of psychology. Settling this significant issue requires understanding the nature of the bridge laws used at the psycho-neural interface. While these laws have been the topic of extensive discussion, such debates have mostly focused on a particular type of link: reductive laws. Reductive laws are problematic: they face notorious philosophical objections and they are too scarce to substantiate current research at the intersection of psychology and neuroscience. The aim of this article is to provide a systematic analysis of a different kind of bridge laws—associative laws—which play a central, albeit overlooked role in scientific practice
PhilPapers/Archive ID
NATMTM
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
What Do Philosophers Believe?Bourget, David & Chalmers, David J.

View all 33 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-05-20

Total downloads
181 ( #14,108 of 37,188 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #22,876 of 37,188 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.