An Intrapersonal Addition Paradox
Ethics 129 (2):309-343 (2019)
Abstract
I present a new argument for the repugnant conclusion. The core of the argument is a risky, intrapersonal analogue of the mere addition paradox. The argument is important for three reasons. First, some solutions to Parfit’s original puzzle do not obviously generalize to the intrapersonal puzzle in a plausible way. Second, it raises independently important questions about how to make decisions under uncertainty for the sake of people whose existence might depend on what we do. And, third, it suggests various difficulties for leading views about the value of a person’s life compared to her nonexistence.
Keywords
Categories
(categorize this paper)
Reprint years
2018, 2019
DOI
PhilPapers/Archive ID
NEBAIA
Revision history

Modal Logic as Metaphysics.Williamson, Timothy
The Good, the Bad, and the Transitivity of Better Than.Nebel, Jacob M.
Priority, Not Equality, for Possible People.Nebel, Jacob M.
The Possibility of Parity.Chang, Ruth
View all 46 references / Add more references

No citations found.
Added to PP index
2017-12-02
Total views
1,236 ( #1,023 of 37,197 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
504 ( #474 of 37,197 )
2017-12-02
Total views
1,236 ( #1,023 of 37,197 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
504 ( #474 of 37,197 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.