An Intrapersonal Addition Paradox

Ethics 129 (2):309-343 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
I present a new argument for the repugnant conclusion. The core of the argument is a risky, intrapersonal analogue of the mere addition paradox. The argument is important for three reasons. First, some solutions to Parfit’s original puzzle do not obviously generalize to the intrapersonal puzzle in a plausible way. Second, it raises independently important questions about how to make decisions under uncertainty for the sake of people whose existence might depend on what we do. And, third, it suggests various difficulties for leading views about the value of a person’s life compared to her nonexistence.
Reprint years
2018, 2019
PhilPapers/Archive ID
NEBAIA
Revision history
First archival date: 2017-12-02
Latest version: 3 (2018-12-27)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Modal Logic as Metaphysics.Williamson, Timothy

View all 46 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-12-02

Total views
1,236 ( #1,023 of 37,197 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
504 ( #474 of 37,197 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.