Teaching Philosophy through Lincoln-Douglas Debate

Teaching Philosophy 36 (3):271-289 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This paper is about teaching philosophy to high school students through Lincoln-Douglas (LD) debate. LD, also known as “values debate,” includes topics from ethics and political philosophy. Thousands of high school students across the U.S. debate these topics in class, after school, and at weekend tournaments. We argue that LD is a particularly effective tool for teaching philosophy, but also that LD today falls short of its potential. We argue that the problems with LD are not inevitable, and we offer strategic recommendations for improving LD as a tool for teaching philosophy. Ultimately, our aim is to create a dialogue between LD and academic philosophy, with the hope that such dialogue will improve LD’s capacity to teach students how to do philosophy.

Author Profiles

Peter van Elswyk
Northwestern University
Jake Nebel
Princeton University
Ryan Harter
Centenary College of Louisiana
1 more


Added to PP

2,396 (#2,326)

6 months
228 (#4,070)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?