Two paradigms for religious representation: The physicist and the playground

Cognition 164:206-211 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In an earlier issue, I argue (2014) that psychology and epistemology should distinguish religious credence from factual belief. These are distinct cognitive attitudes. Levy (2017) rejects this distinction, arguing that both religious and factual “beliefs” are subject to “shifting” on the basis of fluency and “intuitiveness.” Levy’s theory, however, (1) is out of keeping with much research in cognitive science of religion and (2) misrepresents the notion of factual belief employed in my theory. So his claims don’t undermine my distinction. I conclude by suggesting some approaches to empirically testing our views.
Reprint years
2017
PhilPapers/Archive ID
NEITPF-2
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-03-31
View other versions
Added to PP index
2017-03-31

Total views
329 ( #18,128 of 2,432,332 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
20 ( #34,277 of 2,432,332 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.