Two paradigms for religious representation: The physicist and the playground

Cognition 164 (C):206-211 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In an earlier issue, I argue (2014) that psychology and epistemology should distinguish religious credence from factual belief. These are distinct cognitive attitudes. Levy (2017) rejects this distinction, arguing that both religious and factual “beliefs” are subject to “shifting” on the basis of fluency and “intuitiveness.” Levy’s theory, however, (1) is out of keeping with much research in cognitive science of religion and (2) misrepresents the notion of factual belief employed in my theory. So his claims don’t undermine my distinction. I conclude by suggesting some approaches to empirically testing our views.

Author's Profile

Neil Van Leeuwen
Georgia State University

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-03-31

Downloads
511 (#27,748)

6 months
76 (#50,077)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?