Shared intentions, public reason, and political autonomy

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 49 (6):776-804 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
John Rawls claims that public reasoning is the reasoning of ‘equal citizens who as a corporate body impose rules on one another backed by sanctions of state power’. Drawing on an amended version of Michael Bratman’s theory of shared intentions, I flesh out this claim by developing the ‘civic people’ account of public reason. Citizens realize ‘full’ political autonomy as members of a civic people. Full political autonomy, though, cannot be realised by citizens in societies governed by a ‘constrained proceduralist’ account of democratic self-government, or the ‘convergence’ account of public justification formulated recently by Gerald Gaus and Kevin Vallier.
Reprint years
2019
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
NEUSIP-2
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-08-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 50 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-03-16

Total views
115 ( #31,021 of 50,324 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
27 ( #22,752 of 50,324 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.