Games and the art of agency

Philosophical Review 128 (4):423-462 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Games may seem like a waste of time, where we struggle under artificial rules for arbitrary goals. The author suggests that the rules and goals of games are not arbitrary at all. They are a way of specifying particular modes of agency. This is what make games a distinctive art form. Game designers designate goals and abilities for the player; they shape the agential skeleton which the player will inhabit during the game. Game designers work in the medium of agency. Game-playing, then, illuminates a distinctive human capacity. We can take on ends temporarily for the sake of the experience of pursuing them. Game play shows that our agency is significantly more modular and more fluid than we might have thought. It also demonstrates our capacity to take on an inverted motivational structure. Sometimes we can take on an end for the sake of the activity of pursuing that end.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
NGUGAT-2
Revision history
First archival date: 2019-05-01
Latest version: 3 (2019-10-14)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Controlling Attitudes.Hieronymi, Pamela
The Toxin Puzzle.Kavka, Gregory S.

View all 44 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-05-01

Total views
755 ( #3,409 of 43,723 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
653 ( #395 of 43,723 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.