Teaching “Against Marriage," or, "But, Professor, marriage isn't a contract!"

In Stephen Scales, Adam Potthast & Linda Oravecz (eds.), The Ethics of the Family. Cambridge Scholars Press. pp. 121-132 (2010)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this contribution, I advocate diminishing the vision of marriage as an isolated and perfectly free choice between two individuals in love, in order to unseat the extent to which students resist the view that marriage is, among other things, a social contract. I summarize views of Immanuel Kant and Claudia Card, then describe my class presentation of the social significance of marriage. I conclude that students at an individualistic and self-creating point in their lives can be under-appreciative of what their public avowals mean to others, and marriage, in one sense, is indeed public.
Keywords
PhilPapers/Archive ID
NORTAM-5
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-11-30
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-11-30

Total views
66 ( #28,105 of 39,660 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #34,003 of 39,660 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.