Discourse and method

Linguistics and Philosophy 43 (2):119-138 (2020)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Stojnić et al. (2013, 2017) argue that the reference of demonstratives is fixed without any contribution from the extra-linguistic context. On their `prominence/coherence' theory, the reference of a demonstrative expression depends only on its context-independent linguistic meaning. Here, we argue that Stojnić et al.’s striking claims can be maintained in only the thinnest technical sense. Instead of eliminating appeals to the extra-linguistic context, we show how the prominence/coherence theory merely suppresses them. Then we ask why one might be tempted to try and offer such a view. Since we are rather sympathetic to the motivations we find, we close by sketching a more plausible alternative.
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
NOWDAM
Upload history
First archival date: 2019-04-18
Latest version: 3 (2019-07-18)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-04-18

Total views
208 ( #30,179 of 2,454,659 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #40,326 of 2,454,659 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.