‘Corpus vivens est Automaton sui perpetuativum ex naturae instituto’. Some Remarks on Leibniz's Distinction between ‘Machina naturalis’ and ‘Organica artificialia’

Studia Leibnitiana Sonderheft 32:203-216 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

One of the most interesting aspects of Leibniz's philosophy is the distinction between "art" and "nature"; the core of this matter is the possibility (or even the impossibility) of distinguishing as clearly as possible between two ontological domains: on one hand the products of technique (such as "artificial machines"), on the other hand all the beings that can be defined as natural ("natural machines"). The question raised in this paper is if it is possibile to build ontological criteria which can be clear enough to distinguish between the products of nature and those of technique in the field of the "res" that they are.

Author's Profile

Antonio M. Nunziante
University of Padua

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-03

Downloads
99 (#100,691)

6 months
59 (#92,599)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?