The Expansionist View of Systematic Testimonial Injustice: South Asian Context

Symposion: Theoretical and Applied Inquiries in Philosophy and Social Sciences 6 (2):171-181 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, I offer an expansionist view of the Frickerian central case of testimonial injustice, citing examples from the South Asian context. To defend this expansionist position, I provide an argument in three parts. First, I argue that credibility deficit and credibility excess are entangled with each other in such a way that often, one produces the other. Secondly, I contend that we should not say that systematic testimonial injustice is a consequence of credibility deficit only because of the entanglement between them. I also contend that for being the central case of testimonial injustice, identity prejudice should not be necessarily negative; it can be positive as well. Propounding a twofold condition of the status of a knower, the last part claims that testimonial injustice occurs when one of the two conditions remains unmet.

Author's Profile

Kazi A S M Nurul Huda
University of Dhaka

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-12-06

Downloads
76 (#63,419)

6 months
10 (#68,831)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?