Fleeing the Divine: Plato's Rejection of the Ahedonic Ideal in the Philebus

In John Dillon & Brisson Luc (eds.), Plato's Philebus: Selected Papers From the Eighth Symposium Platonicum. pp. 209-214 (2010)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Note: "Next to Godliness" (Apeiron) is an expanded version of this paper. According to Plato's successors, assimilation to god (homoiosis theoi) was the end (telos) of the Platonic system. There is ample evidence to support this claim in dialogues ranging from the Symposium through the Timaeus. However, the Philebus poses a puzzle for this conception of the Platonic telos. On the one hand, Plato states that the gods are beings beyond pleasure while, on the other hand, he argues that the best human life necessarily involves pleasure. In this paper, I argue that the solution to this puzzle lies in the fact that the processes by which we assimilate to god, learning and becoming virtuous, are restitutive and hence pleasant. Thus, the reason why the best human life necessarily involves pleasure is that we can never become fully divine and perfect, but must constantly strive to become like the divine, through pleasureful restitutive processes. In this paper, I also provide a close examination and taxonomy of the different models that Plato presents throughout his corpus of assimilation to god.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
OBDFTD
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-08-26
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-08-26

Total views
71 ( #43,490 of 55,967 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
19 ( #36,267 of 55,967 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.