Action explanation and its presuppositions

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 49 (1):123-146 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In debates about rationalizing action explanation causalists assume that the psychological states that explain an intentional action have both causal and rational features. I scrutinize the presuppositions of those who seek and offer rationalizing action explanations. This scrutiny shows, I argue, that where rational features play an explanatory role in these contexts, causal features play only a presuppositional role. But causal features would have to play an explanatory role if rationalizing action explanation were a species of causal explanation. Consequently, we should conclude that action explanation is not a species of causal explanation.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
Reprint years
2019
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
OBRAEA-3
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-09-04
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Moral Problem.Smith, Michael

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-09-04

Total views
45 ( #29,025 of 37,197 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
45 ( #7,878 of 37,197 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.