Dual Loyalties in Military Medical Care – Between Ethics and Effectiveness

In Herman Amersfoort, Rene Moelker, Joseph Soeters & Desiree Verweij (eds.), Moral Responsibility & Military Effectiveness. Asser (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Military doctors and nurses, working neither as pure soldiers nor as merely doctors or nurses, may face a ‘role conflict between the clinical professional duties to a patient and obligations, express or implied, real or perceived, to the interests of a third party such as an employer, an insurer, the state, or in this context, military command’. This conflict is commonly called dual loyalty. This chapter gives an overview of the military and the medical ethic and of the resulting dual loyalty problem for medical personnel working in the military. It considers how dual loyalties relate to being a professional, something medical personnel are the paradigmatic examples of, but also something military personnel claim to be. Against that background, the chapter elaborates on the medical rules of eligibility used in Afghanistan, and on the policies concerning military involvement in local healthcare, to see what the existing rules and policies are, and whose interests they serve.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
OLSDLI
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Dual Loyalty Among Military Health Professionals: Human Rights and Ethics in Times of Armed Conflict.London, Leslie; Rubenstein, Leonard S.; Baldwin-Ragaven, Laurel & van Es, Adriaan

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-09-30

Total views
745 ( #4,632 of 50,241 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
48 ( #12,266 of 50,241 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.