Koons' Cosmological Argument

Faith and Philosophy 16 (3):378-389 (1999)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Robert Koons has recently defended what he claims is a successful argument for the existence of a necessary first cause, and which he develops by taking “a new look” at traditional arguments from contingency. I argue that Koons’ argument is less than successful; in particular, I claim that his attempt to “shift the burden of proof” to non-theists amounts to nothing more than an ill-disguised begging of one of the central questions upon which theists and non-theists disagree. I also argue that his interesting attempt to bridge (part of) the familiar gap between the claim that there is a necessary first cause and the claim that God exists is beset with numerous difficulties.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-01-12
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
96 ( #38,913 of 56,086 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #42,425 of 56,086 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.