On behalf of the fool

Analysis 71 (2):304-306 (2011)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This paper responds to a previous paper by Gary Matthews and Lynne Rudder Baker. Their paper, in turn, was a response to my reply to an even earlier paper of theirs. (The relevant bibliographical details are in this paper.) They claim to have a new, improved, simple ontological argument. I argue that the new, simple ontological argument is not, in any way, improved.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-01-12
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
158 ( #37,478 of 65,595 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #42,709 of 65,595 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.