On behalf of the fool
Analysis 71 (2):304-306 (2011)
Abstract
This paper responds to a previous paper by Gary Matthews and Lynne Rudder Baker. Their paper, in turn, was a response to my reply to an even earlier paper of theirs. (The relevant bibliographical details are in this paper.) They claim to have a new, improved, simple ontological argument. I argue that the new, simple ontological argument is not, in any way, improved.
Keywords
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
OPPOBO
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-01-12
View other versions
View other versions
Added to PP index
2010-12-30
Total views
158 ( #37,478 of 65,595 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #42,709 of 65,595 )
2010-12-30
Total views
158 ( #37,478 of 65,595 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #42,709 of 65,595 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
