The Tristram Shandy Paradox
Philosophia Christi 4 (2):335-349 (2002)
Abstract
This paper is a response to David Oderberg's discussion of the Tristram Shandy paradox. I defend the claim that the Tristram Shandy paradox does not support the claim that it is impossible that the past is infinite.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
OPPTTS-2
Upload history
Archival date: 2016-03-02
View other versions
View other versions
Added to PP index
2014-11-04
Total views
661 ( #6,757 of 55,835 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
117 ( #4,837 of 55,835 )
2014-11-04
Total views
661 ( #6,757 of 55,835 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
117 ( #4,837 of 55,835 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.