The Tristram Shandy Paradox

Philosophia Christi 4 (2):335-349 (2002)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This paper is a response to David Oderberg's discussion of the Tristram Shandy paradox. I defend the claim that the Tristram Shandy paradox does not support the claim that it is impossible that the past is infinite.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2016-03-02
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
661 ( #6,757 of 55,835 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
117 ( #4,837 of 55,835 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.