The Tristram Shandy Paradox

Philosophia Christi 4 (2):335-349 (2002)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This paper is a response to David Oderberg's discussion of the Tristram Shandy paradox. I defend the claim that the Tristram Shandy paradox does not support the claim that it is impossible that the past is infinite.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-03-02
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Craig’s Kalam Cosmology.Graham Oppy - 2009 - Philo 12 (2):200-216.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
541 ( #7,347 of 50,238 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
95 ( #5,237 of 50,238 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.