The Tristram Shandy Paradox

Graham Oppy

The Tristram Shandy Paradox

Philosophia Christi 4 (2):335-349 (2002)

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers

Abstract

This paper is a response to David Oderberg's discussion of the Tristram Shandy paradox. I defend the claim that the Tristram Shandy paradox does not support the claim that it is impossible that the past is infinite.

Keywords

kalam cosmological argument Tristram Shandy paradox infinity time causation infinite past

Categories

Kalam Cosmological Argument in Philosophy of Religion

Philosophy of Religion

Philosophy of Time, Misc in Metaphysics

(categorize this paper)

DOI

10.5840/pc20024237

PhilPapers/Archive ID

OPPTTS-2

Revision history

Archival date: 2016-03-02
View upload history

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

From the Tristram Shandy Paradox to the Christmas Shandy Paradox: Reply to Oderberg.Graham Oppy - 2003 - Ars Disputandi 3 (1):172-195.

Craig’s Kalam Cosmology.Graham Oppy - 2009 - Philo 12 (2):200-216.

Add more citations

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-11-04

Total views
541 ( #7,347 of 50,238 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
95 ( #5,237 of 50,238 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload

This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.

Applied ethics	Epistemology	History of Western Philosophy	Meta-ethics	Metaphysics	Normative ethics
Philosophy of biology	Philosophy of language	Philosophy of mind	Philosophy of religion	Science Logic and Mathematics	More ...