Normative Judgment and Rational Requirements: A Reply to Ridge

Analytic Philosophy 59 (2):281-290 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
I examine and rebut Ridge’s two arguments for Capacity Judgment Internalism (simply qua their particular character and content, first person normative judgments are necessarily capable of motivating without the help of any independent desire). First, the rejection of the possibility of anormativism (sec. 2), second, an argument from the rational requirement to intend to do as one judges that one ought to do (sec. 3). I conclude with a few remarks about the nature of this requirement and about verdicts of akrasia. (sec. 4).
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-06-26
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Impassioned Belief.Ridge, Michael

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
206 ( #21,116 of 50,260 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
52 ( #11,032 of 50,260 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.