Normative Judgment and Rational Requirements: A Reply to Ridge

Analytic Philosophy 59 (2):281-290 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
I examine and rebut Ridge’s two arguments for Capacity Judgment Internalism (simply qua their particular character and content, first person normative judgments are necessarily capable of motivating without the help of any independent desire). First, the rejection of the possibility of anormativism (sec. 2), second, an argument from the rational requirement to intend to do as one judges that one ought to do (sec. 3). I conclude with a few remarks about the nature of this requirement and about verdicts of akrasia. (sec. 4).
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-06-26
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
356 ( #19,495 of 65,534 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
60 ( #13,346 of 65,534 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.