The Aesthetics of Theory Selection and the Logics of Art

Philosophy of Science (2):325-343 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Philosophers of science discuss whether theory selection depends on aesthetic judgments or criteria, and whether these putatively aesthetic features are genuinely extra-epistemic. As examples, judgments involving criteria such as simplicity and symmetry are often cited. However, other theory selection criteria, such as fecundity, coherence, internal consistency, and fertility, more closely match those criteria used in art contexts and by scholars working in aesthetics. Paying closer attention to the way these criteria are used in art contexts allows us to understand some evaluative and developmental practices in scientific theory selection as genuinely aesthetic, enlarging the scope of the goals of science.
Reprint years
2019
PhilPapers/Archive ID
OTAO
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-06-24
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Values in Science.McMullin, Ernan
Scientific Change: Philosophical Models and Historical Research.Laudan, Larry; Donovan, Arthur; Laudan, Rachel; Barker, Peter; Brown, Harold; Leplin, Jarrett; Thagard, Paul & Wykstra, Steve

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Art Experience.McCallum, Kate; Mitchell, Scott & Scott-Phillips, Thom

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-06-07

Total views
97 ( #25,130 of 40,769 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
58 ( #9,556 of 40,769 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.