Lakatos’ “Internal History” as Historiography

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Imre Lakatos' conception of the history of science is explicated with the purpose of replying to criticism leveled against it by Thomas Kuhn, Ian Hacking, and others. Kuhn's primary argument is that the historian's internal—external distinction is methodologically superior to Lakatos' because it is "independent" of an analysis of rationality. That distinction, however, appears to be a normative one, harboring an implicit and unarticulated appeal to rationality, despite Kuhn's claims to the contrary. Lakatos' history, by contrast, is clearly the history of a normatively defined discipline; of science and not scientists and their activities. How such history can be written, the historiographic and critical tools available for its construction, and its importance as history, are considered in detail. In an afterword, the prevalence of Lakatos' treatment of history in philosophical discussion is indicated: A related approach is shown to arise in social contract theory.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2015-11-21
Latest version: 3 (2015-11-21)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Against Generality: Meaning in Genetics and Philosophy.Burian, Richard M.; Richardson, Robert C. & Van der Steen, Wim J.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
229 ( #17,963 of 47,194 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #36,579 of 47,194 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.