Research, Teaching and Service: Why Shouldn't Women's Work Count?

Journal of Higher Education 67 (1):46-84 (1996)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This article examines one way institutionalized sexism operates in the university setting by examining the gender roles and gender hierarchies implicit in (allegedly gender-neutral) university tenure and promotion policies. Current working assumptions regarding (1) what constitutes good research, teaching, and service and (2) the relative importance of each of these endeavors reflect and perpetuate masculine values and practices, thus preventing the professional advancement of female faculty both individually and collectively. A gendered division of labor exists within (as outside) the contemporary academy wherein research is implicitly deemed "men's work" and is explicitly valued, whereas teaching and service are characterized as "women's work" and explicitly devalued.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-07-14
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
1,776 ( #2,246 of 65,735 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
194 ( #2,582 of 65,735 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.