Scientific Understanding, Fictional Understanding, and Scientific Progress

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The epistemic account and the noetic account hold that the essence of scientific progress is the increase in knowledge and understanding, respectively. Dellsén (2018) criticizes the epistemic account (Park, 2017a) and defends the noetic account (Dellsén, 2016). I argue that Dellsén’s criticisms against the epistemic account fail, and that his notion of understanding, which he claims requires neither belief nor justification, cannot explain scientific progress, although it can explain fictional progress in science-fiction.
Reprint years
2019, 2020
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2019-08-24
Latest version: 2 (2019-09-25)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
237 ( #27,459 of 64,247 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
25 ( #27,781 of 64,247 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.