The Moral Epistemological Argument for Atheism

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Numerous supposed immoral mandates and commands by God found in religious texts are introduced and discussed. Such passages are used to construct a logical contradiction contention that is called the moral epistemological argument. It is shown how there is a contradiction in that God is omnibenevolent, God can instruct human beings, and God at times provides us with unethical orders and laws. Given the existence of the contradiction, it is argued that an omnibenevolent God does not exist. Finally, this contention is defended from several objections.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2016-03-10
Latest version: 2 (2018-03-14)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Psychology of Meta-Ethics: Exploring Objectivism.Goodwin, Geoffrey P. & Darley, John M.
Why I Am Not a Christian.Russell, Bertrand

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
348 ( #11,296 of 46,183 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
77 ( #8,892 of 46,183 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.