Understanding without Justification and Belief?

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Dellsén (2016a) argues that understanding requires neither justification nor belief. I object that ridding understanding of justification and belief comes with the following costs. (i) No claim about the world can be inferred from what we understand. (ii) We run into either Moore’s paradox or certain disconcerting questions. (iii) Understanding does not represent the world. (iv) Understanding cannot take the central place in epistemology. (v) Understanding cannot be invoked to give an account of scientific progress. (vi) It is not clear how misunderstanding arises.
Reprint years
2017, 2018
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2018-01-23
Latest version: 2 (2018-05-11)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
268 ( #24,748 of 64,219 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #48,014 of 64,219 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.