Can disjunctivists explain our access to the sensible world?

Philosophical Issues 21 (1):384-433 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Develops an empirical argument against naive realism-disjunctivism: if naive realists accept "internal dependence", then they cannot explain the evolution of perceptual success. Also presents a puzzle about our knowledge of universals.

Author's Profile

Adam Pautz
Brown University

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-10-27

Downloads
293 (#28,870)

6 months
42 (#24,142)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?