Naive Realism and the Science of Consciousness

Analytic Philosophy (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
I begin by describing what I call simple naïve realism. Then I describe relevant empirical results. Next, I develop two new empirical arguments against simple naive realism. Then I briefly look at two new, more complex forms of naïve realism: one due to Keith Allen and the other due to Heather Logue and Ori Beck. I argue that they are not satisfactory retreats for naive realists. The right course is to reject naive realism altogether. My stalking horse is contemporary naive realism but there is a larger, positive lesson: new empirical results support a brain-based theory of sensory consciousness.
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-09-02
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
308 ( #14,585 of 50,238 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
166 ( #2,565 of 50,238 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.