Conciliar Christology and the Consistency of Divine Immutability with a Mutable, Incarnate God

Nova et Vetera 16 (3):913-937 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
[paragraph 3 of the article] The goal of this article is to flesh out that initial understanding of incarnational immutability. The method I employ to attain this goal is to consider cases of predications from the texts of conciliar Christology. I show potential ontological truth conditions for those predications being true that do not require the truth conditions I propose for immutability to be unsatisfied. Put otherwise, I show ontological truth conditions for predications that imply Christ’s mutability and Incarnation that are also consistent with the truth of “Christ is immutable.” Since the truth conditions for the incarnational texts do not require the falsity of the claim that “Christ is immutable,” the incarnational claims do not require the rejection of immutability. In other words, the Incarnation is no reason to deny divine immutability, and vice versa.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-08-22
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
427 ( #13,188 of 2,426,000 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
115 ( #5,230 of 2,426,000 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.