Procreative Beneficence, Obligation, and Eugenics

Genomics, Society and Policy 3 (3):43-59 (2007)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The argument of Julian Savulescu’s 2001 paper, “Procreative Beneficence: Why We Should Select the Best Children” is flawed in a number of respects. Savulescu confuses reasons with obligations and equivocates between the claim that parents have some reason to want the best for their children and the more radical claim that they are morally obligated to attempt to produce the best child possible. Savulescu offers a prima facie implausible account of parental obligation, as even the best parents typically fail to do everything they think would be best for their children let alone everything that is in fact best for their children. The profound philosophical difficulties which beset the attempt to formulate a plausible account of the best human life constitute a further independent reason to resile from Savulescu’s conclusion. Savulescu’s argument also requires parents to become complicit with racist and homophobic oppression, which is yet another reason to reject it. Removing the equivocation from Savulescu’s argument allows us to see that the assertion of an obligation to choose the “best child” has much more in common with the “old” eugenics than Savulescu acknowledges
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PBO
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
From Chance to Choice: Genetics and Justice.Buchanan, Allen; Brock, Dan W.; Daniels, Norman & Wikler, Daniel
Liberal Eugenics.Agar, Nicholas

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-10-22

Total views
725 ( #3,085 of 40,772 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
134 ( #3,044 of 40,772 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.