On Some Arguments for Epistemic Value Pluralism

Logos and Episteme 11 (1):77-96 (2020)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Epistemic Value Monism is the view that there is only one kind of thing of basic, final epistemic value. Perhaps the most plausible version of Epistemic Value Monism is Truth Value Monism, the view that only true beliefs are of basic, final epistemic value. Several authors—notably Jonathan Kvanvig and Michael DePaul—have criticized Truth Value Monism by appealing to the epistemic value of things other than knowledge. Such arguments, if successful, would establish Epistemic Value Pluralism is true and Epistemic Value Monism is false. This paper critically examines those arguments, finding them wanting. However, I develop an argument for Epistemic Value Pluralism that succeeds which turns on general reflection on the nature of value.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PEROSA-3
Upload history
First archival date: 2020-05-08
Latest version: 2 (2020-05-08)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2020-05-08

Total views
55 ( #41,712 of 51,423 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
55 ( #9,705 of 51,423 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.