Principles for allocation of scarce medical interventions

The Lancet 373 (9661):423--431 (2009)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Allocation of very scarce medical interventions such as organs and vaccines is a persistent ethical challenge. We evaluate eight simple allocation principles that can be classified into four categories: treating people equally, favouring the worst-off, maximising total benefits, and promoting and rewarding social usefulness. No single principle is sufficient to incorporate all morally relevant considerations and therefore individual principles must be combined into multiprinciple allocation systems. We evaluate three systems: the United Network for Organ Sharing points systems, quality-adjusted life-years, and disability-adjusted life-years. We recommend an alternative system—the complete lives system—which prioritises younger people who have not yet lived a complete life, and also incorporates prognosis, save the most lives, lottery, and instrumental value principles
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PERPFA-2
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View other versions
Added to PP index
2015-10-05

Total views
8,789 ( #198 of 64,133 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4,369 ( #33 of 64,133 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.