Principles for allocation of scarce medical interventions

The Lancet 373 (9661):423--431 (2009)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Allocation of very scarce medical interventions such as organs and vaccines is a persistent ethical challenge. We evaluate eight simple allocation principles that can be classified into four categories: treating people equally, favouring the worst-off, maximising total benefits, and promoting and rewarding social usefulness. No single principle is sufficient to incorporate all morally relevant considerations and therefore individual principles must be combined into multiprinciple allocation systems. We evaluate three systems: the United Network for Organ Sharing points systems, quality-adjusted life-years, and disability-adjusted life-years. We recommend an alternative system—the complete lives system—which prioritises younger people who have not yet lived a complete life, and also incorporates prognosis, save the most lives, lottery, and instrumental value principles
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PERPFA-2
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Severity as a Priority Setting Criterion: Setting a Challenging Research Agenda.Barra, Mathias; Broqvist, Mari; Gustavsson, Erik; Henriksson, Martin; Juth, Niklas; Sandman, Lars & Solberg, Carl Tollef
When Clinical Trials Compete: Prioritising Study Recruitment.Gelinas, Luke; Lynch, Holly Fernandez; E. Bierer, Barbara & Cohen, I. Glenn

View all 49 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-10-05

Total views
2,086 ( #557 of 39,997 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
390 ( #791 of 39,997 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.